CASES<\/h1><\/h1><\/div>CASES<\/h1><\/h1><\/div>ANALYSIS, PROJECT MANAGEMENT & TRAINING<\/h2><\/h1><\/div>ANALYSIS, PROJECT MANAGEMENT & TRAINING<\/h2><\/h1><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>![\"\"](\"https:\/\/compilot.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/baeredygtig-processer-hvid-150x150.png\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/compilot.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/baeredygtig-bundlinje-EUR-hvid-150x150.png\")
<\/strong><\/p>\nPROCESSES & BOTTOM LINE<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>GET AN EXPERIENCED “PILOT” ON BOARD<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>Here’s where we created great results<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>QUALITY TESTING AN EXISTING PROJECT BUDGET<\/h2><\/div>CONTRACTOR: Kingo Karlsen Nedrivning A\/S<\/h3><\/div>Task: Analyzing costs in a large project<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>It’s about creating a holistic view of the projects and especially that we include the external uncertainties and identify the 10 most important ones.<\/p>\n
Henrik led us through an analysis of a large project, giving us a big picture, a Top 10 list of uncertainties, a robust budget and the start of our action plans.<\/p>\n
It was a really good process and the top 10 list proved to be a useful tool. With this background, we were then able to navigate our way around the worst ‘icebergs’.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>Head of Division, Nico J\u00f8rgensen<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>See interview of CEO<\/span><\/a><\/div>See interview of CEO<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>![\"Kingo](\"https:\/\/compilot.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/profil_kingo-carlsen_nico-joergensen-225x300.jpg\" "\\"profil_kingo-carlsen_nico-joergensen\\"")
<\/span><\/div>![\"Kingo](\"https:\/\/compilot.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/profil_kingo-carlsen_nico-joergensen_th-225x300.jpg\" "\\"profil_kingo-carlsen_nico-joergensen_th\\"")
<\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>ANALYSIS OF THE COMPANY’S 3-YEAR PERFORMANCE<\/h2><\/div>CONTRACTOR: Vils Entrepren\u00f8rforretning A\/S<\/h3><\/div>Task: Risk management in relation to goal achievement from a 3-year perspective. <\/strong><\/p>\nManagement wanted to identify the uncertainties for their performance.<\/p>\n
Who did what?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n- We delivered a 3-day workshop where management identified uncertainties, revenues and expenses<\/li>\n
- The Executive Board and the Chairman of the Board provided input during the process<\/li>\n
- We delivered a visual process that led participants through a Successive analysis<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Result<\/strong>: A 3-year result with an indication of the Top10 uncertainties and a number of practical action plans.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>We contacted Henrik k S\u00f8ndergaard as we wanted to pressure test our profit and budget ambitions for a 3-year period and at the same time get an overview of the company’s risk picture.<\/p>\n
Henrik led us safely through an analysis using the Successive Principle, where we identified and quantified the most important risks and uncertainties.<\/p>\n
We then created action plans for the most significant issues.
\nFurthermore, we gained a shared understanding of how the method works and can be used for analysis in other situations.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>CEO, Erik Yde<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div>![\"Vils](\"https:\/\/compilot.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/profilfoto_vils-entreprenoerforretning_direktoer_erik-yde-larsen-227x300.jpg\" "\\"profilfoto_vils-entreprenoerforretning_direktoer_erik-yde-larsen\\"")
<\/span><\/div>![\"Vils](\"https:\/\/compilot.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/profilfoto_vils-entreprenoerforretning_direktoer_erik-yde-larsen-tv-227x300.jpg\" "\\"profilfoto_vils-entreprenoerforretning_direktoer_erik-yde-larsen-tv\\"")
<\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>ANALYZING THE COSTS OF A LARGE PROJECT<\/h2><\/div>CONTRACTOR: Kaj Bech A\/S<\/h3><\/div>Task: Uncertainty analysis of project budget<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>We needed an overview of a large project for planning purposes.<\/p>\n
We invited Henrik K S\u00f8ndergaard to lead us through a workshop where we could pressure test our budget and gain insight into the uncertainties of the project.<\/p>\n
Analysis<\/strong>:
\nWe were a broader group than usual investigating the project and Henrik guided us through a Successive Analysis.<\/p>\nResults:<\/strong>
\nThis meant that we all got a good insight into the project, costs and not least the uncertainties.<\/p>\nWe became aware of other risks by sitting together and brainstorming about them. We got a Top 10 list of uncertainties, even though there were many others in the project.
\nWe then created some practical action plans.<\/p>\n
We are now aware of our own risks that we can act on – and have insight into risks that point towards the customer. In addition, we received an assessment of the robustness of the existing budget.<\/p>\n
All in all, a method and process that we can recommend.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>Project Manager, Nickolai Buus Petersen<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div>![\"Entrepren\u00f8r](\"https:\/\/compilot.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/profilfoto_kaj-bech_nickolai-buus-petersen-235x300.jpg\" "\\"profilfoto_kaj-bech_nickolai-buus-petersen\\"")
<\/span><\/div>![\"Entrepren\u00f8r](\"https:\/\/compilot.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/profilfoto_kaj-bech_nickolai-buus-petersen_th-209x300.jpg\" "\\"profilfoto_kaj-bech_nickolai-buus-petersen_th\\"")
<\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>OFFER: MUNICIPAL SW PROJECT<\/h2><\/div>KB Software<\/h3><\/div>Task: Uncertainty analysis of SW offers<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>OFFER FOR A MUNICIPAL SW PROJECT<\/strong>
\nWe were in a situation where we had to provide a quote for a SW task to a municipality. The project was not clearly described, so we wanted to get a good picture of the uncertainties before we made an offer.<\/p>\nWe had Henrik K. S\u00f8ndergaard (COMPILOT) to guide us through an uncertainty analysis based on the Successive Principle.<\/p>\n
Unknown Unknowns<\/strong>
\nThis turned out to be a good idea when our eyes were opened to Unknown Unknowns. What we didn’t know – that we didn’t know, about the project – well, there were many unknowns and factors in the deliverables and not least outside the deliverables.<\/p>\nWith Henrik’s help, we estimated the minor and major Unknown Unknowns. So, how many could come and how many hours could they cost per piece.<\/p>\n
Shared insights<\/strong>
\nWe got a shared impression of the project and the associated risk picture, including a Top 10 list of the most important ones.<\/p>\nWe highly recommend using the method and Henrik to facilitate analysis.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>KB Software CEO, Klaus Bj\u00f8rnestad
\nMentor-IT Key account manager, Carl Gabriel<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>See YouTube video<\/span><\/a><\/div>See YouTube video<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>![](\"https:\/\/compilot.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/tidlig-kvalitetssikring-med-successiv-princippet-sw-tilbud-kommune.jpg\")
<\/a><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>OFFSHORE PARK BUSINESS CASE (\u20ac BILLION)<\/h2><\/div>ENERGY COMPANY: VATTENFALL A\/S<\/h3><\/div>Task: Final check of a \u20ac Bill. Business Case<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>We were in a situation where we needed to test the business case for a large offshore wind farm. We had our own models and with such a large investment wanted an external assessment.<\/p>\n
We had Henrik K S\u00f8ndergaard model the business case using a top-down method (Successive Principle), which could relatively quickly calculate the project’s key figures: Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Net Present Value (NPV) and payback time.<\/p>\n
Above all, this method can calculate the uncertainties<\/em> for the key figures and show the Top10 uncertainties in the business case even with all the details and information included in such a model.<\/p>\nWe analyzed different configurations of the wind farm and gained a deeper understanding of the project’s uncertainties and insights into possible choices and action plans.<\/p>\n
It was a very good supplement to our own internal models – it gave us the opportunity to evaluate our calculations.<\/p>\n
I highly recommend using the method if you want an early assessment of the uncertainties in your business cases\/projects.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>Bo Svoldgaard, Vattenfall – Head of Engineering and Technology, BA Wind.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>
CASES<\/h1><\/h1><\/div>ANALYSIS, PROJECT MANAGEMENT & TRAINING<\/h2><\/h1><\/div>ANALYSIS, PROJECT MANAGEMENT & TRAINING<\/h2><\/h1><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div> <\/strong><\/p>\nPROCESSES & BOTTOM LINE<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>GET AN EXPERIENCED “PILOT” ON BOARD<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>Here’s where we created great results<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>QUALITY TESTING AN EXISTING PROJECT BUDGET<\/h2><\/div>CONTRACTOR: Kingo Karlsen Nedrivning A\/S<\/h3><\/div>Task: Analyzing costs in a large project<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>It’s about creating a holistic view of the projects and especially that we include the external uncertainties and identify the 10 most important ones.<\/p>\n
Henrik led us through an analysis of a large project, giving us a big picture, a Top 10 list of uncertainties, a robust budget and the start of our action plans.<\/p>\n
It was a really good process and the top 10 list proved to be a useful tool. With this background, we were then able to navigate our way around the worst ‘icebergs’.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>Head of Division, Nico J\u00f8rgensen<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>See interview of CEO<\/span><\/a><\/div>See interview of CEO<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/span><\/div><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>ANALYSIS OF THE COMPANY’S 3-YEAR PERFORMANCE<\/h2><\/div>CONTRACTOR: Vils Entrepren\u00f8rforretning A\/S<\/h3><\/div>Task: Risk management in relation to goal achievement from a 3-year perspective. <\/strong><\/p>\nManagement wanted to identify the uncertainties for their performance.<\/p>\n
Who did what?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n- We delivered a 3-day workshop where management identified uncertainties, revenues and expenses<\/li>\n
- The Executive Board and the Chairman of the Board provided input during the process<\/li>\n
- We delivered a visual process that led participants through a Successive analysis<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Result<\/strong>: A 3-year result with an indication of the Top10 uncertainties and a number of practical action plans.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>We contacted Henrik k S\u00f8ndergaard as we wanted to pressure test our profit and budget ambitions for a 3-year period and at the same time get an overview of the company’s risk picture.<\/p>\n
Henrik led us safely through an analysis using the Successive Principle, where we identified and quantified the most important risks and uncertainties.<\/p>\n
We then created action plans for the most significant issues.
\nFurthermore, we gained a shared understanding of how the method works and can be used for analysis in other situations.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>CEO, Erik Yde<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/span><\/div><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>ANALYZING THE COSTS OF A LARGE PROJECT<\/h2><\/div>CONTRACTOR: Kaj Bech A\/S<\/h3><\/div>Task: Uncertainty analysis of project budget<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>We needed an overview of a large project for planning purposes.<\/p>\n
We invited Henrik K S\u00f8ndergaard to lead us through a workshop where we could pressure test our budget and gain insight into the uncertainties of the project.<\/p>\n
Analysis<\/strong>:
\nWe were a broader group than usual investigating the project and Henrik guided us through a Successive Analysis.<\/p>\nResults:<\/strong>
\nThis meant that we all got a good insight into the project, costs and not least the uncertainties.<\/p>\nWe became aware of other risks by sitting together and brainstorming about them. We got a Top 10 list of uncertainties, even though there were many others in the project.
\nWe then created some practical action plans.<\/p>\n
We are now aware of our own risks that we can act on – and have insight into risks that point towards the customer. In addition, we received an assessment of the robustness of the existing budget.<\/p>\n
All in all, a method and process that we can recommend.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>Project Manager, Nickolai Buus Petersen<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/span><\/div><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>OFFER: MUNICIPAL SW PROJECT<\/h2><\/div>KB Software<\/h3><\/div>Task: Uncertainty analysis of SW offers<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>OFFER FOR A MUNICIPAL SW PROJECT<\/strong>
\nWe were in a situation where we had to provide a quote for a SW task to a municipality. The project was not clearly described, so we wanted to get a good picture of the uncertainties before we made an offer.<\/p>\nWe had Henrik K. S\u00f8ndergaard (COMPILOT) to guide us through an uncertainty analysis based on the Successive Principle.<\/p>\n
Unknown Unknowns<\/strong>
\nThis turned out to be a good idea when our eyes were opened to Unknown Unknowns. What we didn’t know – that we didn’t know, about the project – well, there were many unknowns and factors in the deliverables and not least outside the deliverables.<\/p>\nWith Henrik’s help, we estimated the minor and major Unknown Unknowns. So, how many could come and how many hours could they cost per piece.<\/p>\n
Shared insights<\/strong>
\nWe got a shared impression of the project and the associated risk picture, including a Top 10 list of the most important ones.<\/p>\nWe highly recommend using the method and Henrik to facilitate analysis.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>KB Software CEO, Klaus Bj\u00f8rnestad
\nMentor-IT Key account manager, Carl Gabriel<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>See YouTube video<\/span><\/a><\/div>See YouTube video<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/a><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>OFFSHORE PARK BUSINESS CASE (\u20ac BILLION)<\/h2><\/div>ENERGY COMPANY: VATTENFALL A\/S<\/h3><\/div>Task: Final check of a \u20ac Bill. Business Case<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>We were in a situation where we needed to test the business case for a large offshore wind farm. We had our own models and with such a large investment wanted an external assessment.<\/p>\n
We had Henrik K S\u00f8ndergaard model the business case using a top-down method (Successive Principle), which could relatively quickly calculate the project’s key figures: Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Net Present Value (NPV) and payback time.<\/p>\n
Above all, this method can calculate the uncertainties<\/em> for the key figures and show the Top10 uncertainties in the business case even with all the details and information included in such a model.<\/p>\nWe analyzed different configurations of the wind farm and gained a deeper understanding of the project’s uncertainties and insights into possible choices and action plans.<\/p>\n
It was a very good supplement to our own internal models – it gave us the opportunity to evaluate our calculations.<\/p>\n
I highly recommend using the method if you want an early assessment of the uncertainties in your business cases\/projects.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>Bo Svoldgaard, Vattenfall – Head of Engineering and Technology, BA Wind.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>
ANALYSIS, PROJECT MANAGEMENT & TRAINING<\/h2><\/h1><\/div>ANALYSIS, PROJECT MANAGEMENT & TRAINING<\/h2><\/h1><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div> <\/strong><\/p>\nPROCESSES & BOTTOM LINE<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>GET AN EXPERIENCED “PILOT” ON BOARD<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>Here’s where we created great results<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>QUALITY TESTING AN EXISTING PROJECT BUDGET<\/h2><\/div>CONTRACTOR: Kingo Karlsen Nedrivning A\/S<\/h3><\/div>Task: Analyzing costs in a large project<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>It’s about creating a holistic view of the projects and especially that we include the external uncertainties and identify the 10 most important ones.<\/p>\n
Henrik led us through an analysis of a large project, giving us a big picture, a Top 10 list of uncertainties, a robust budget and the start of our action plans.<\/p>\n
It was a really good process and the top 10 list proved to be a useful tool. With this background, we were then able to navigate our way around the worst ‘icebergs’.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>Head of Division, Nico J\u00f8rgensen<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>See interview of CEO<\/span><\/a><\/div>See interview of CEO<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/span><\/div><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>ANALYSIS OF THE COMPANY’S 3-YEAR PERFORMANCE<\/h2><\/div>CONTRACTOR: Vils Entrepren\u00f8rforretning A\/S<\/h3><\/div>Task: Risk management in relation to goal achievement from a 3-year perspective. <\/strong><\/p>\nManagement wanted to identify the uncertainties for their performance.<\/p>\n
Who did what?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n- We delivered a 3-day workshop where management identified uncertainties, revenues and expenses<\/li>\n
- The Executive Board and the Chairman of the Board provided input during the process<\/li>\n
- We delivered a visual process that led participants through a Successive analysis<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Result<\/strong>: A 3-year result with an indication of the Top10 uncertainties and a number of practical action plans.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>We contacted Henrik k S\u00f8ndergaard as we wanted to pressure test our profit and budget ambitions for a 3-year period and at the same time get an overview of the company’s risk picture.<\/p>\n
Henrik led us safely through an analysis using the Successive Principle, where we identified and quantified the most important risks and uncertainties.<\/p>\n
We then created action plans for the most significant issues.
\nFurthermore, we gained a shared understanding of how the method works and can be used for analysis in other situations.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>CEO, Erik Yde<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/span><\/div><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>ANALYZING THE COSTS OF A LARGE PROJECT<\/h2><\/div>CONTRACTOR: Kaj Bech A\/S<\/h3><\/div>Task: Uncertainty analysis of project budget<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>We needed an overview of a large project for planning purposes.<\/p>\n
We invited Henrik K S\u00f8ndergaard to lead us through a workshop where we could pressure test our budget and gain insight into the uncertainties of the project.<\/p>\n
Analysis<\/strong>:
\nWe were a broader group than usual investigating the project and Henrik guided us through a Successive Analysis.<\/p>\nResults:<\/strong>
\nThis meant that we all got a good insight into the project, costs and not least the uncertainties.<\/p>\nWe became aware of other risks by sitting together and brainstorming about them. We got a Top 10 list of uncertainties, even though there were many others in the project.
\nWe then created some practical action plans.<\/p>\n
We are now aware of our own risks that we can act on – and have insight into risks that point towards the customer. In addition, we received an assessment of the robustness of the existing budget.<\/p>\n
All in all, a method and process that we can recommend.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>Project Manager, Nickolai Buus Petersen<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/span><\/div><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>OFFER: MUNICIPAL SW PROJECT<\/h2><\/div>KB Software<\/h3><\/div>Task: Uncertainty analysis of SW offers<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>OFFER FOR A MUNICIPAL SW PROJECT<\/strong>
\nWe were in a situation where we had to provide a quote for a SW task to a municipality. The project was not clearly described, so we wanted to get a good picture of the uncertainties before we made an offer.<\/p>\nWe had Henrik K. S\u00f8ndergaard (COMPILOT) to guide us through an uncertainty analysis based on the Successive Principle.<\/p>\n
Unknown Unknowns<\/strong>
\nThis turned out to be a good idea when our eyes were opened to Unknown Unknowns. What we didn’t know – that we didn’t know, about the project – well, there were many unknowns and factors in the deliverables and not least outside the deliverables.<\/p>\nWith Henrik’s help, we estimated the minor and major Unknown Unknowns. So, how many could come and how many hours could they cost per piece.<\/p>\n
Shared insights<\/strong>
\nWe got a shared impression of the project and the associated risk picture, including a Top 10 list of the most important ones.<\/p>\nWe highly recommend using the method and Henrik to facilitate analysis.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>KB Software CEO, Klaus Bj\u00f8rnestad
\nMentor-IT Key account manager, Carl Gabriel<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>See YouTube video<\/span><\/a><\/div>See YouTube video<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/a><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>OFFSHORE PARK BUSINESS CASE (\u20ac BILLION)<\/h2><\/div>ENERGY COMPANY: VATTENFALL A\/S<\/h3><\/div>Task: Final check of a \u20ac Bill. Business Case<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>We were in a situation where we needed to test the business case for a large offshore wind farm. We had our own models and with such a large investment wanted an external assessment.<\/p>\n
We had Henrik K S\u00f8ndergaard model the business case using a top-down method (Successive Principle), which could relatively quickly calculate the project’s key figures: Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Net Present Value (NPV) and payback time.<\/p>\n
Above all, this method can calculate the uncertainties<\/em> for the key figures and show the Top10 uncertainties in the business case even with all the details and information included in such a model.<\/p>\nWe analyzed different configurations of the wind farm and gained a deeper understanding of the project’s uncertainties and insights into possible choices and action plans.<\/p>\n
It was a very good supplement to our own internal models – it gave us the opportunity to evaluate our calculations.<\/p>\n
I highly recommend using the method if you want an early assessment of the uncertainties in your business cases\/projects.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>Bo Svoldgaard, Vattenfall – Head of Engineering and Technology, BA Wind.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>
ANALYSIS, PROJECT MANAGEMENT & TRAINING<\/h2><\/h1><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div> <\/strong><\/p>\nPROCESSES & BOTTOM LINE<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>GET AN EXPERIENCED “PILOT” ON BOARD<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>Here’s where we created great results<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>QUALITY TESTING AN EXISTING PROJECT BUDGET<\/h2><\/div>CONTRACTOR: Kingo Karlsen Nedrivning A\/S<\/h3><\/div>Task: Analyzing costs in a large project<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>It’s about creating a holistic view of the projects and especially that we include the external uncertainties and identify the 10 most important ones.<\/p>\n
Henrik led us through an analysis of a large project, giving us a big picture, a Top 10 list of uncertainties, a robust budget and the start of our action plans.<\/p>\n
It was a really good process and the top 10 list proved to be a useful tool. With this background, we were then able to navigate our way around the worst ‘icebergs’.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>Head of Division, Nico J\u00f8rgensen<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>See interview of CEO<\/span><\/a><\/div>See interview of CEO<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/span><\/div><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>ANALYSIS OF THE COMPANY’S 3-YEAR PERFORMANCE<\/h2><\/div>CONTRACTOR: Vils Entrepren\u00f8rforretning A\/S<\/h3><\/div>Task: Risk management in relation to goal achievement from a 3-year perspective. <\/strong><\/p>\nManagement wanted to identify the uncertainties for their performance.<\/p>\n
Who did what?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n- We delivered a 3-day workshop where management identified uncertainties, revenues and expenses<\/li>\n
- The Executive Board and the Chairman of the Board provided input during the process<\/li>\n
- We delivered a visual process that led participants through a Successive analysis<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Result<\/strong>: A 3-year result with an indication of the Top10 uncertainties and a number of practical action plans.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>We contacted Henrik k S\u00f8ndergaard as we wanted to pressure test our profit and budget ambitions for a 3-year period and at the same time get an overview of the company’s risk picture.<\/p>\n
Henrik led us safely through an analysis using the Successive Principle, where we identified and quantified the most important risks and uncertainties.<\/p>\n
We then created action plans for the most significant issues.
\nFurthermore, we gained a shared understanding of how the method works and can be used for analysis in other situations.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>CEO, Erik Yde<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/span><\/div><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>ANALYZING THE COSTS OF A LARGE PROJECT<\/h2><\/div>CONTRACTOR: Kaj Bech A\/S<\/h3><\/div>Task: Uncertainty analysis of project budget<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>We needed an overview of a large project for planning purposes.<\/p>\n
We invited Henrik K S\u00f8ndergaard to lead us through a workshop where we could pressure test our budget and gain insight into the uncertainties of the project.<\/p>\n
Analysis<\/strong>:
\nWe were a broader group than usual investigating the project and Henrik guided us through a Successive Analysis.<\/p>\nResults:<\/strong>
\nThis meant that we all got a good insight into the project, costs and not least the uncertainties.<\/p>\nWe became aware of other risks by sitting together and brainstorming about them. We got a Top 10 list of uncertainties, even though there were many others in the project.
\nWe then created some practical action plans.<\/p>\n
We are now aware of our own risks that we can act on – and have insight into risks that point towards the customer. In addition, we received an assessment of the robustness of the existing budget.<\/p>\n
All in all, a method and process that we can recommend.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>Project Manager, Nickolai Buus Petersen<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/span><\/div><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>OFFER: MUNICIPAL SW PROJECT<\/h2><\/div>KB Software<\/h3><\/div>Task: Uncertainty analysis of SW offers<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>OFFER FOR A MUNICIPAL SW PROJECT<\/strong>
\nWe were in a situation where we had to provide a quote for a SW task to a municipality. The project was not clearly described, so we wanted to get a good picture of the uncertainties before we made an offer.<\/p>\nWe had Henrik K. S\u00f8ndergaard (COMPILOT) to guide us through an uncertainty analysis based on the Successive Principle.<\/p>\n
Unknown Unknowns<\/strong>
\nThis turned out to be a good idea when our eyes were opened to Unknown Unknowns. What we didn’t know – that we didn’t know, about the project – well, there were many unknowns and factors in the deliverables and not least outside the deliverables.<\/p>\nWith Henrik’s help, we estimated the minor and major Unknown Unknowns. So, how many could come and how many hours could they cost per piece.<\/p>\n
Shared insights<\/strong>
\nWe got a shared impression of the project and the associated risk picture, including a Top 10 list of the most important ones.<\/p>\nWe highly recommend using the method and Henrik to facilitate analysis.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>KB Software CEO, Klaus Bj\u00f8rnestad
\nMentor-IT Key account manager, Carl Gabriel<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>See YouTube video<\/span><\/a><\/div>See YouTube video<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div>Inquire further<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/a><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>OFFSHORE PARK BUSINESS CASE (\u20ac BILLION)<\/h2><\/div>ENERGY COMPANY: VATTENFALL A\/S<\/h3><\/div>Task: Final check of a \u20ac Bill. Business Case<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>We were in a situation where we needed to test the business case for a large offshore wind farm. We had our own models and with such a large investment wanted an external assessment.<\/p>\n
We had Henrik K S\u00f8ndergaard model the business case using a top-down method (Successive Principle), which could relatively quickly calculate the project’s key figures: Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Net Present Value (NPV) and payback time.<\/p>\n
Above all, this method can calculate the uncertainties<\/em> for the key figures and show the Top10 uncertainties in the business case even with all the details and information included in such a model.<\/p>\nWe analyzed different configurations of the wind farm and gained a deeper understanding of the project’s uncertainties and insights into possible choices and action plans.<\/p>\n
It was a very good supplement to our own internal models – it gave us the opportunity to evaluate our calculations.<\/p>\n
I highly recommend using the method if you want an early assessment of the uncertainties in your business cases\/projects.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i>Bo Svoldgaard, Vattenfall – Head of Engineering and Technology, BA Wind.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>
PROCESSES & BOTTOM LINE<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div> GET AN EXPERIENCED “PILOT” ON BOARD<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div> Here’s where we created great results<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div> Task: Analyzing costs in a large project<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/i> It’s about creating a holistic view of the projects and especially that we include the external uncertainties and identify the 10 most important ones.<\/p>\n Henrik led us through an analysis of a large project, giving us a big picture, a Top 10 list of uncertainties, a robust budget and the start of our action plans.<\/p>\n It was a really good process and the top 10 list proved to be a useful tool. With this background, we were then able to navigate our way around the worst ‘icebergs’.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i> Head of Division, Nico J\u00f8rgensen<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div> Task: Risk management in relation to goal achievement from a 3-year perspective. <\/strong><\/p>\n Management wanted to identify the uncertainties for their performance.<\/p>\n Who did what?<\/strong><\/p>\n Result<\/strong>: A 3-year result with an indication of the Top10 uncertainties and a number of practical action plans.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i> We contacted Henrik k S\u00f8ndergaard as we wanted to pressure test our profit and budget ambitions for a 3-year period and at the same time get an overview of the company’s risk picture.<\/p>\n Henrik led us safely through an analysis using the Successive Principle, where we identified and quantified the most important risks and uncertainties.<\/p>\n We then created action plans for the most significant issues. CEO, Erik Yde<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div> Task: Uncertainty analysis of project budget<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/i> We needed an overview of a large project for planning purposes.<\/p>\n We invited Henrik K S\u00f8ndergaard to lead us through a workshop where we could pressure test our budget and gain insight into the uncertainties of the project.<\/p>\n Analysis<\/strong>: Results:<\/strong> We became aware of other risks by sitting together and brainstorming about them. We got a Top 10 list of uncertainties, even though there were many others in the project. We are now aware of our own risks that we can act on – and have insight into risks that point towards the customer. In addition, we received an assessment of the robustness of the existing budget.<\/p>\n All in all, a method and process that we can recommend.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i> Project Manager, Nickolai Buus Petersen<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div> Task: Uncertainty analysis of SW offers<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/i> OFFER FOR A MUNICIPAL SW PROJECT<\/strong> We had Henrik K. S\u00f8ndergaard (COMPILOT) to guide us through an uncertainty analysis based on the Successive Principle.<\/p>\n Unknown Unknowns<\/strong> With Henrik’s help, we estimated the minor and major Unknown Unknowns. So, how many could come and how many hours could they cost per piece.<\/p>\n Shared insights<\/strong> We highly recommend using the method and Henrik to facilitate analysis.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i> KB Software CEO, Klaus Bj\u00f8rnestad Task: Final check of a \u20ac Bill. Business Case<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/i> We were in a situation where we needed to test the business case for a large offshore wind farm. We had our own models and with such a large investment wanted an external assessment.<\/p>\n We had Henrik K S\u00f8ndergaard model the business case using a top-down method (Successive Principle), which could relatively quickly calculate the project’s key figures: Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Net Present Value (NPV) and payback time.<\/p>\n Above all, this method can calculate the uncertainties<\/em> for the key figures and show the Top10 uncertainties in the business case even with all the details and information included in such a model.<\/p>\n We analyzed different configurations of the wind farm and gained a deeper understanding of the project’s uncertainties and insights into possible choices and action plans.<\/p>\n It was a very good supplement to our own internal models – it gave us the opportunity to evaluate our calculations.<\/p>\n I highly recommend using the method if you want an early assessment of the uncertainties in your business cases\/projects.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i> Bo Svoldgaard, Vattenfall – Head of Engineering and Technology, BA Wind.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div> <\/strong><\/p>\nQUALITY TESTING AN EXISTING PROJECT BUDGET<\/h2><\/div>
CONTRACTOR: Kingo Karlsen Nedrivning A\/S<\/h3><\/div>
<\/span><\/div><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>ANALYSIS OF THE COMPANY’S 3-YEAR PERFORMANCE<\/h2><\/div>
CONTRACTOR: Vils Entrepren\u00f8rforretning A\/S<\/h3><\/div>
\n
\nFurthermore, we gained a shared understanding of how the method works and can be used for analysis in other situations.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/i><\/span><\/div><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>ANALYZING THE COSTS OF A LARGE PROJECT<\/h2><\/div>
CONTRACTOR: Kaj Bech A\/S<\/h3><\/div>
\nWe were a broader group than usual investigating the project and Henrik guided us through a Successive Analysis.<\/p>\n
\nThis meant that we all got a good insight into the project, costs and not least the uncertainties.<\/p>\n
\nWe then created some practical action plans.<\/p>\n<\/span><\/div><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>OFFER: MUNICIPAL SW PROJECT<\/h2><\/div>
KB Software<\/h3><\/div>
\nWe were in a situation where we had to provide a quote for a SW task to a municipality. The project was not clearly described, so we wanted to get a good picture of the uncertainties before we made an offer.<\/p>\n
\nThis turned out to be a good idea when our eyes were opened to Unknown Unknowns. What we didn’t know – that we didn’t know, about the project – well, there were many unknowns and factors in the deliverables and not least outside the deliverables.<\/p>\n
\nWe got a shared impression of the project and the associated risk picture, including a Top 10 list of the most important ones.<\/p>\n
\nMentor-IT Key account manager, Carl Gabriel<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/a><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>OFFSHORE PARK BUSINESS CASE (\u20ac BILLION)<\/h2><\/div>
ENERGY COMPANY: VATTENFALL A\/S<\/h3><\/div>
![\"Bo](\"https:\/\/compilot.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/profilfoto_bo-svoldgaard_330-290x300.jpg\" "\\"profilfoto_bo-svoldgaard_330\\"")
<\/span><\/div>![\"Bo](\"https:\/\/compilot.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/profilfoto_bo-svoldgaard_330_th-290x300.jpg\" "\\"profilfoto_bo-svoldgaard_330_th\\"")
<\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>